Injury prevention and screening in sport

Global guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour across the lifespan and clinical populations.

• Adults should do 150 to 300 minutes of moderate, or 75 to 150 minutes of vigorous, aerobic activity per week, plus muscle strengthening on two or more days.
• Some physical activity is better than none, and any amount counts toward health benefits; sedentary time should be limited.
• Recommendations extend across the lifespan and to pregnancy, older adults and people with chronic conditions or disability.

Our appraisal: A GRADE-informed guideline from a large evidence review, so the dose targets are among the better-grounded numbers in this field. Its limitation is deliberate breadth: it sets population activity doses, not sport-specific training prescriptions, and stops short of a firm sedentary-time threshold.

IOC consensus standardising how injury and illness are defined, recorded and reported in sport, and introducing the STROBE Extension for Sport Injury and Illness Surveillance.

• Standardises definitions for injury and illness, their severity, and how athlete exposure is captured and reported.
• Introduces the STROBE Extension for Sport Injury and Illness Surveillance (STROBE-SIIS) as a reporting guideline.
• Recommends expressing risk as incidence and burden, that is severity combined with incidence, rather than injury counts alone.

Our appraisal: This is a methods consensus, not a clinical recommendation; its value is making injury and illness data comparable across studies and squads. It does not tell you how to prevent injury, but it defines the denominator and outcomes against which any prevention claim should be judged.

International consensus on the prevention, diagnosis and management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients.

• Stresses that management in growing children must protect open growth plates and be individualised with the family.
• Prioritises timely diagnosis, specialist involvement and shared decision-making over a one-size-fits-all surgical rule.
• Highlights neuromuscular training as the mainstay of prevention in youth.

Our appraisal: Expert consensus addressing questions where randomised evidence in children is scarce; it frames a cautious, individualised approach rather than resolving graft or timing debates. Weight it as the best available structured guidance for a population that trials rarely study.

IOC consensus on how training and competition load relate to injury and illness risk, and how to monitor it.

• Load itself is not the enemy; appropriate, progressive load builds the capacity that protects athletes, whereas rapid changes relative to what an athlete is accustomed to are associated with raised injury risk.
• Recommends monitoring both external load, what the athlete does, and internal load, the physiological and psychological response, alongside athlete wellbeing.
• Presents the acute:chronic workload ratio as one monitoring concept, flagging rapid load increases as higher risk, and stresses individualised load progression.
• Notes that many modifiers, including sleep, psychological stress and previous injury, shape the relationship between load and injury.

Our appraisal: Structured expert consensus rather than a trial, so it frames how to think about load rather than proving any threshold. Note that the acute:chronic workload ratio it helped popularise has since been heavily criticised on methodological grounds, including spurious correlation, arbitrary cut-offs and uncertain modelling, so treat specific ratios as a prompt for discussion, not a rule.

International consensus on developing healthy, resilient and capable young athletes, covering maturation, training, specialisation and wellbeing.

• Emphasises that training and expectations should track biological maturation, not just chronological age.
• Cautions against early single-sport specialisation for most youth, citing overuse injury and burnout risk.
• Frames long-term athletic development around enjoyment, diverse movement and appropriate progressive loading.

Our appraisal: Consensus synthesis of expert opinion and observational evidence; it sets sound developmental principles rather than prescribing validated dose thresholds. It is most useful as a framework for age- and maturity-appropriate planning.

IOC consensus recommending a structured periodic health evaluation for elite athletes, covering cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, general and mental health.

• Recommends a structured, periodic health evaluation rather than a single one-off pre-participation examination.
• Covers cardiovascular screening, musculoskeletal assessment, and general and mental health.
• Positions the evaluation as a chance to educate athletes and establish baselines, while acknowledging limited evidence that screening prevents outcomes.

Our appraisal: Expert consensus from 2009, so both the evidence and some recommendations, particularly around cardiac screening, have moved on and remain debated. It is useful as a template for what a periodic health review can cover, but it is not evidence that screening changes injury or illness outcomes.